Disrupting the Affection and Intimacy market for the better
Article's dependency: Intimacy - The Forgotten Gift
Processes of implicit human programming through experience
Step 1: Program educational systems to force opposite gender interaction
The most approachable way to force opposite gender classes is through workgroup classes
Education curriculum must be adapted to include meaningful workgroup school classes that provide meaning work and space for autonomy and self-expression.
Step 2: Improving elementary school playground experience
School break time almost never has any sort of programmatic activities. The point is to make auxiliar teachers promote playground activities in between children during elementary school.
This is crucial stage of development that must be addressed for the most diversity and multiplicity of interaction and in between genders.
This elementary school has a great representative example of a great effort to provide the most rich experiences:
https://www.facebook.com/pg/eramos.um.cooperativa.de.ensino/photos/
Step 3: Triggering higher probability of polyamorous relationships in teenagers (more turnovers and less left outs)
How do you increase the probability dating events in between teenagers?
Beyond just that and everything that had been done in Step 1 and Step 2, how do you teach/force polyamory implicitly? How the can you do this through educational systems and it's physical establishments?
After thousands of different simulated mental experiences and interactions with multiple conceptual personalities, this can go very much beyond school education and it's place.
There are multiple factors such as:
Conceptual poliamoric setup
Let's imagine the whole "market" consists in a classroom with 10 girls and 10 boys.
You have to acknowledge that girls and boys don't necessarily share physiological necessities and psychological interests.
So let's imagine, 4 of these girls monopolize the market of 10 boys, they created a polyamoric game , rigged the "supply". These 4 girls can now date and grab attention from all these boys, while doing it all consensually with the rest of the group. These boys and girls will all share a wide range of great experiences either in group or more intimately.
By definition girls have higher probability to succeed on trigger such relationship system
But are they able to grasp beyond the short term benefits?
What do they get in return?
Substantial amounts of trust, mutual support and emotional attachment for life, even if these boys don't actually become their monogamous partner. Now the girls can "control" them benevolently in a favor chain ratio of 10/4, while the other 6 girls are left in the dust.
How do they do it? Physical interaction keeps everybody's relationships healthy and united (Oh yeah, huh)
If the 6 girls want to join the "game", they have to "play" by these fair trade rules, you got to have something to offer. Otherwise you won't get anything for free, not even attention.
Creating the possibility of healthy transitions from polyamory to conscious monogamy in which many ones earned lots of experience.
If guys were smarter too and didn't give so much remote attention for free in return for nothing (vice-versa also applies), this could be more easily executable. There still lots of variable into play that need to be addressed, specially the factors I've mentioned before.
I can conclude we're still too shy in these matters.
For a better visual-emotional representation of these conceptualized relational experiences, I recommend this movie for better internal contemplation and inspiration for certain aspects within these social age range interactions
Thirteen (2003)
Processes of implicit human programming through experience
Step 1: Program educational systems to force opposite gender interaction
The most approachable way to force opposite gender classes is through workgroup classes
Education curriculum must be adapted to include meaningful workgroup school classes that provide meaning work and space for autonomy and self-expression.
School break time almost never has any sort of programmatic activities. The point is to make auxiliar teachers promote playground activities in between children during elementary school.
This is crucial stage of development that must be addressed for the most diversity and multiplicity of interaction and in between genders.
This elementary school has a great representative example of a great effort to provide the most rich experiences:
https://www.facebook.com/pg/eramos.um.cooperativa.de.ensino/photos/
Step 3: Triggering higher probability of polyamorous relationships in teenagers (more turnovers and less left outs)
How do you increase the probability dating events in between teenagers?
Beyond just that and everything that had been done in Step 1 and Step 2, how do you teach/force polyamory implicitly? How the can you do this through educational systems and it's physical establishments?
After thousands of different simulated mental experiences and interactions with multiple conceptual personalities, this can go very much beyond school education and it's place.
There are multiple factors such as:
- Monogamy biases induced by society in general
- Lack of locomotive and financial freedom
- Not owning a place to stay privately
- Lack of acknowledgment of it's benefits (cost/benefit) from all parties
Conceptual poliamoric setup
Let's imagine the whole "market" consists in a classroom with 10 girls and 10 boys.
You have to acknowledge that girls and boys don't necessarily share physiological necessities and psychological interests.
So let's imagine, 4 of these girls monopolize the market of 10 boys, they created a polyamoric game , rigged the "supply". These 4 girls can now date and grab attention from all these boys, while doing it all consensually with the rest of the group. These boys and girls will all share a wide range of great experiences either in group or more intimately.
By definition girls have higher probability to succeed on trigger such relationship system
But are they able to grasp beyond the short term benefits?
What do they get in return?
Substantial amounts of trust, mutual support and emotional attachment for life, even if these boys don't actually become their monogamous partner. Now the girls can "control" them benevolently in a favor chain ratio of 10/4, while the other 6 girls are left in the dust.
How do they do it? Physical interaction keeps everybody's relationships healthy and united (Oh yeah, huh)
If the 6 girls want to join the "game", they have to "play" by these fair trade rules, you got to have something to offer. Otherwise you won't get anything for free, not even attention.
Creating the possibility of healthy transitions from polyamory to conscious monogamy in which many ones earned lots of experience.
If guys were smarter too and didn't give so much remote attention for free in return for nothing (vice-versa also applies), this could be more easily executable. There still lots of variable into play that need to be addressed, specially the factors I've mentioned before.
I can conclude we're still too shy in these matters.
For a better visual-emotional representation of these conceptualized relational experiences, I recommend this movie for better internal contemplation and inspiration for certain aspects within these social age range interactions
Thirteen (2003)
Comments
Post a Comment